By having a centralised payer or provider, public systems are able to conduct centralised procurement and leverage volumes to achieve reduced prices, thereby increasing adoption and accessibility of hearing aids. For example, while the penetration of hearing aids in many H.I.C. is on average only 20%, in countries such as Norway and the U.K., the strength of a publicly supported provision system has contributed to ~45% market coverage.56, 57 In these countries, governments play a critical role in providing the funding for products and provision, and negotiating terms with suppliers, while service provision may be delivered by either the public sector or contracted out to the private sector.
For example, N.H.S. England is a public procurer that conducts volume-based negotiation to drive down prices (refer to Case Study 4). U.K. tender information is made available on the E.U. website and is often consulted by E.U. countries that are procuring hearing aids. However, under U.K. regulations, other countries are not able to procure from the procurement framework.58 Over time, the prices have proved sustainable, and as volumes have increased, prices have further decreased.59 The Clinical Commissioning Group for each local area within the N.H.S. sets the tariff for reimbursement of providers (both public and private) contracted to provide hearing services. The recommended tariff for 2016/2017 for hearing assessment, fitting of two hearing aids device, cost of two devices, and three years of follow up was around G.B.P.£370 but can vary based on a number of adjustment factors.60